Microsoft Direct3D 10.1 Presentations at Siggraph 2007
Below follows a link to all of Microsoft’s Siggraph 2007 presentations in one ZIP file.
Share on
X Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky
Archive
- 2026 (2)
- 2025 (2)
- 2024 (3)
- 2023 (14)
- 2020 (2)
- 2017 (3)
- 2016 (3)
- 2013 (1)
- 2011 (12)
- 2010 (5)
- 2009 (5)
- 2008 (21)
-
2007 (17)
- Visual Studio 2008 Released to MSDN Subscribers
- OpenGL 3.0: Finally some news!
- A retrospective view of a 1996 Steve Jobs interview
- Re: Microsoft Open Source
- NVSG: NVIDIA Scene Graph SDK 4.0
- Atom: a gem in the making
- The State of DirectX 10
- id Software: John Carmack's Response to OpenGL issue
- idTech 5, Rage, and more in 3 Videos
- Microsoft Direct3D 10.1 Presentations at Siggraph 2007
- Way Off Topic: Internet Taxes, November 1st 2007
- id Software: bye OpenGL, bye Linux
- XNA Game Studio 2.0 Announced
- DirectX 10: Is it worth upgrading to Vista for?
- Programmer's Block
- Google Music Trends
- ATi too slow or NVIDIA too fast?
- 2006 (15)
Common Tags
You may also enjoy
mkdocs-alias-plugin 0.10.0 Release
The latest version, v0.10.0, of the mkdocs-alias-plugin is now available here. This new version adds the ability to use aliases in Markdown footnotes, a great way to keep links short and organized.
mkdocs-alias-plugin is an MkDocs plugin allowing links to your pages using a custom alias such as [[my-alias]] or [[my-alias|My Title]].
Jekyll on sourcehut pages
In a New Year’s resolution-driven attempt to un-Microsoft-ify my life, I’m moving all of my repositories over from GitHub (owned by Microsoft) to sourcehut (owned by some dude). This blog was the first repo to make the switch and was previously hosted via GitHub Pages, and now uses sourcehut pages instead. Here’s the config I created to make the CI-driven deployment work:
The Books of 2025
This year I read a surprising (to me) amount of books: 21 according to my notes, 6 more than last year. Here they are, listed chronologically in reading order. I’ll also list my favorite reads towards the end of the post.
Copyleft From Now On
I’ve been putting my work online in various formats for almost 20 years now. For most of that time, I’ve used extremely permissive licenses such as the MIT License to distribute my work in an attempt to promote usage and adoption. Now that I’m quite a bit older and experienced (you may say curmudgeony), let me tell you why I’m changing my tune and am adopting a Copyleft approach.
In the past decade or so, I’ve noticed a widespread adoption of the MIT license, even by those who in the past opposed Open Source Software as a concept. Why the swing and why so extreme? You’d think that those companies would slowly adopt Open Source rather than going all-in all at once. What’s going on?